Thursday, February 15, 2024

The Ascension Path of Deification (Part 1): Re-reading The Book of Mormon as a Theosis Manual (Insights from Adrian P. Larsen)


The following contains my notes and commentary after watching the video presentation The Book of Mormon as Ascension Text by Adrian Larsen. The following is meant to supplement and expand upon Larson's video presentation which I recommend one views first.


Adrian Larsen begins by quoting the following Restoration Scriptures which portrays God's energy or sacred spirit (or the fluid nooma) being given to empower one to become enlightened and/or experience an ascension experience. The ascension experience in brief is where one experiences in a vision the transportation of their soul or spirit to the third tier of heaven where they behold the glory (splendor) of Jehovah on his throne; which illuminates them and thus deifies them (i.e. begins the process of theosis). For more details see James Tabor's essays here and here, and this excellent video here, which video I recommend being watched along with Larson's video before reading the following.


Adrian Larsen explains how The Book of Mormon functions as a manual for achieving a similar ascension experience as did the apostle Paul, Lehi, Nephi, and the Brother of Jared (in the Book of Ether), etc. He begins by quoting The original doctrine of the LDS Church as found in The Lectures on Faith, Lecture 2:25 that reads (emphasis added):

...though our first parents were driven out of the garden of Eden, and were even separated from the presence of God, by a vail, they still retained a knowledge of his existence, and that sufficiently to move them to call upon him. And further, that no sooner was the plan of redemption revealed to man, and he began to call upon God, than the Holy Spirit was given, bearing record of the Father and Son.

Thus we see the vail (veil) separates but the sacred nooma, when gifted, unites one with the Divine Source. He also references Genesis 3:5 (EXB) where Adam and Eve are told:

[For] God knows that if you eat the fruit from that tree [from it], [your eyes will be opened and] you will learn about [experience; know about] good and evil and you will be like God!”

He then references Moroni 7: 32-33 (emphasis added):

... the Lord God prepares the way that the residue of men may have faith in Christ, that the Holy Ghost may have place in their hearts, according to the power thereof; and after this manner brings to pass the Father, the covenants which he has made unto the children of men. And Christ has said: If you will have faith in me you shall have power to do whatsoever thing is expedient in me.

Adrian Larson then quotes from the Third Lecture on Faith (emphasis added): 

2 Let us here observe, that three things are necessary, in order that any rational and intelligent being may exercise faith in God unto life and salvation.

3 First, The idea that he actually exists.

4 Secondly, A correct idea of his character, perfections and attributes.

5 Thirdly, An actual knowledge that the course of life which he is pursuing, is according to his will.—For without an acquaintance with these three important facts, the faith of every rational being must be imperfect and unproductive; but with this understanding, it can become perfect and fruitful, abounding in righteousness unto the praise and glory of God the Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ.

The original LDS Scriptures had a very clear, concise and simple course of life. Adrian Larson then puts on the screen Joseph Smith's religion in a nutshell through two concepts: 


  • Individually: Ascent 
  • Community: Zion


At 24 minutes he discusses repentance and asks "What do we have to repent of?" He then points out that in the Book of Mormon it's false traditions that we need to repent of by quoting Alma 12 and how a curse of God had fallen upon them because of the destructive traditions of their fathers. His presentation seeks to replace false traditions with the true path of acension; which he considers the actual knowledge of the right course of life in accordance with God's will, as recorded in the Scriptures. 


Ascending to God's Throne


Larson goes on to explain that there is a consistent description of of the ascension path: starting with a various descriptions in Scripture of a corridor to the divine realm or God's throne, such as the pillar of fire from the tabernacle tent in the Old Testament (as depicted below in these screen shots of his presentation):



Click Image to Enlarge

He then summarizes the symbolism and metaphors of such an ascent experience described in Scripture:


Click Image to Enlarge


Click Image to Enlarge

Note that this is the emphasis in the Seventh Lecture on Faith, that of becoming a holy (set-apart) being and Christ is the prototype of a holy being. A holy being is simply one who can stand in the fiery presence of the divine Father who is a personage of glory (splendor) and firey power per Lecture 5. In other words, the whole message of Genesis to Revelation in the Bible is how to return to God's fiery presence through various modes of ascension to the heavenly throne room of God. So that the Book Mormon acts as an additional manual on ascension in that it elaborates on the ascension method that Christianity in general provides through faith and baptism into Christ.


Christ was the First Fruits to Ascend so that we too could ascend to the Father's throne


I point out in my Godhead series that the prototype of Christ is the duplicate genome of the personage of the Father-Jehovah as a radiant Sun-like personage of spirit (noomatic matter), glory (splendor) and fiery power. In other words, the Deity of Lecture 2, as the only Bupreme Being -- "in whom all fulness and perfection dwells, who is omnipotent, omnipresent, and omniscient" (Lecture 2:2) -- molded for Himself a body as Father-Jehovah, a personage of spirit (noomatic matter), in the form of the future earth-born Jesus of Nazareth; as the future earthly form of Jesus was foreseen before the earth was even formed and before Jesus' birth through the Deity's omniscience (see Lecture 2:2). In other words, the Deity as a Sun-like omnipresent Intelligence, Light, or Divine Mind, formed Himself into a personage of noomatic splendor like the fiery Sun as the Father-Jehovah (see Lecture 5). The Father's personage of fiery splendor is why a person must be born again (see Mosiah 5:6-7; 27:25-26Alma 7:14), i.e. reborn of God's Monogene, in order to be in the Father's presence and behold his splendor (glory) by receiving the luminous genetic genome of the personage of the Father-Jehovah through Jesus, the Only Begotten (Unique Monogene). This is why Moses's face shined after experiencing being in the presence of Father-Jehovah, as it was like being engulfed in divine fire and God's radiant presence basically rubbed off on him for some time. Then on earth Jehovah duplicated his radiant genome by generating the Only Begotten (i.e. Unique Monogene) so that all who are born of God's duplicate genome can become the children (genus) of Christ and thus dwell in Jehovah's fiery presence. 


So that because the earth-born Jesus receives the fulness of the glory (splendor) of the Father, Jesus is spoken of as the Light (the light of Christ) who in 3 Nephi shines on his disciples so they shine as white in brightness as Jesus who is a Sun-like tabernacled personage of glory (splendor) and power; as Jesus is a duplicate of the personage of the Sun-like Father, as a personage of tabernacle (resurrected flesh) that is illuminated by the full splendor of the Father (see D&C 93 and Lecture 5); and thus Jesus is the protype of a human body becoming the same Sun-like species or genus as the personage of the Father-Jehovah (as explained in Lecture #7).


This is why in the King Follet Discourse, Joseph Smith said you have got to learn how to be God yourselves and dwell in everlasting burnings. He is referring to the Sun-like splendor (glory) of the Father-Jehovah who is a fiery luminous presence, and how in order to be able to see and be near God one must be like Him by undergoing noomatic gene therapy; and receive the same fiery Divine DNA through the baptism of fire and the refiner's fire; which begins metamorphosizing one's genetic code into the divine code of a luminous being. All of this is accomplished simply through one's baptism and reception of the Holy Ghost, and/or it is experienced through the path of ascension. In other words, certain persons in the Book of Mormon experience visionary experiences where they ascend to be in the presence of God and are transformed into the same kind of divine body as Jesus in order to be in the presence of Jehovah; meanwhile, others receive the transformation and the beginning process of spiritual metamorphosis or theosis (deification) through the simple method of faith and the baptism of fire.


The Ascension Experience as Confirmation of being Saved by Grace (i.e. Gifted with a Celestial Body)


Just as the apostle Paul's ascension experience confirmed to him that the baptism of fire removed the need or necessity of the Mosaic Law Code for Gentiles (who also experienced the baptism of fire); so too, modern Mormons can rightly feel assured that their own sincerely recieved baptism of fire (in any Christian church), removed any need for any ongoing works-based man-made traditions or policies in the Brighamite sect or any other sect or religious institution. 


If this is true, however, what do we do with doctrines and practices that developed in the 1840s about needing to go to the temple and receive a celestial marriage? I will address this questions in Part (4).


Shared Beliefs About Theosis in Christianity


This video on Eastern Orthodox theology, when combined with the video presentation on the Book of Mormon as an Ascension text here, combined with the research of Denver S. and his emphasis on seeing the Lord face to face, one finds a continuity of views on theosis and the Divine Light. It's clear from this that Joseph Smith was providing the Book of Mormon as a manual for deification by receiving the illuminating Light of Christ; so that one is deified and becomes one of the sons of God and partakers of the heavenly gift.


The Path of Ascension as Seeing the Lord Face to Face as He Is


Returning to the Book of Mormon as an ascension text, we read in Lecture 2:5 (emphasis added):


Let us here observe, that after any portion of the human family are made acquainted with the important fact that there is a God who has created and does uphold all things, the extent of their knowledge, respecting his character and glory, will depend upon their diligence and faithfulness in seeking after him, until like Enoch the brother of Jared, and Moses, they shall obtain faith in God, and power with him to behold him face to face.


Adrian Larson then states in his presentation:

... the Book of Mormon is a record by and about, those who made the ascent and returned to Christ's presence while yet mortal. It is a lesson manual and a how-to-guide for those who wish to similarly ascend and meet our Lord face to face.


Larson then talks about how the text of the Book of Mormon is about "moving from less holiness to greater holiness as a mystic guide." Again, this "holiness" he speaks of would be the deification process described in Lecture on Faith #7


Adrian Larson then explains that the Doctrine of Christ is basically the method of how to 

return to God's presence (the ascent). Faith is to see and act on the situation. Repentance is to change course. Baptism is to go down into the depths, cross water, meaning a new condition on the other side. Then the Holy Ghost and the baptism of fire makes a change.


Larson then quotes 2 Nephi 32:5 (emphasis added):

For behold, again I say unto you that if you will enter in by the way, and receive the Holy Ghost, it will show unto you all things what you should do

In other words, you are being divinized with the sacred nooma, which teaches you what to do in all things, not the arm of flesh (religious leaders) who's dictates may go against "the dictates of our own conscience" (see Articles of Faith 1:11).

He then talks about a corridor, as in a connection between realms through the veil. 

Larson says that in 1 Nephi 1, Lehi "prayed unto the Lord" and "there came a pillar of fire and dwelt upon a rock before him, and he saw and heard much. .. thus overcome with the [nooma], he was carried away in a vision ... and he thought he saw God sitting upon his throne" ... [and he] "beheld his glory" and was "encircled about eternally in the arms of his love." Compare how Alma says, “Methought I saw, even as our father Lehi saw, God sitting upon his throne” (Alma 36:22). 

Larson then says that later on in 1 Nephi 10, Nephi talks about how "the mysteries of God shall be unfolded to them by the power of the Holy Ghost ..." just like "in times of old ... Wherefore, the course of the Lord is one eternal round." I interpret this as, just as we see in Moses' experience that the Lord and his countenance (face) glowed like the Sun, today's Christians are to also experience God's fiery glory and also have their countenance changed through the baptism of fire; which divinizes our bodies so that we are capable of seeing the Lord face-to-face without any religious barriers and instead having direct contact with God. Thus, again, we read in Lecture 2:5 (emphasis added):


Let us here observe, that after any portion of the human family are made acquainted with the important fact that there is a God who has created and does uphold all things, the extent of their knowledge, respecting his character and glory, will depend upon their diligence and faithfulness in seeking after himuntil like Enoch the brother of Jared, and Moses, they shall obtain faith in God, and power with him to behold him face to face.


Adding to Larson's presentation, Scripture explains that you cannot see the Lord face to face unless you're transformed from a mortal body into a glorified (celestial/starry) body, either temporarily in a visionary state or permanently through the divine DNA. This is the message of the Book of Mormon, that deification (or glorification, i.e. becoming holy through a noomatic "fulness" per Lecture 5) comes only through the merits of Christ and his gifting you (the grace gift of) the divine DNA through the baptism of fire: which transforms you from a "natural man" with an adamic body into a noomatic "personage of glory and power" (per Lecture 5 & 7). So that just like the resurrected Jesus as the "Lord of glory" (1 Cor. 2:8), as the prototype of a holy (glorious) being per Lecture 7, the Christian becomes a holy (divinized) being and thus deified as a personage of holiness by adoption through the seed of Christ (see Isaiah 53:10; Mosiah 15:10-13), thus becoming "begotten sons and daughters unto God" (D&C 76:24), as it is "written, they are gods, even the sons of God" (D&C 76:58).


Larson goes on to explain that in Alma chapter 36, Alma the younger says that after praying for mercy that he could remember "his sins no more" and "what joy and what marvelous light I did behold." This would be the partaking of the divine nature (gift) from the Father of lights through the Son as the resurrection and the Light; with the Light of Christ (the glory of the Lord) as the nooma, had transformed Alma in that moment so that he was able to dwell permanently in God's everlasting burnings. Another example Larson gives of the fiery glory of the Lord deifying a person is later on in Helaman 5 when Lehi and Nephi and the sons of Helaman are "encircled about as if by fire ... and when they saw that they were encircled about with a pillar of fire and that it burned them not, their hearts did take courage. .. and behold, they did shine exceedingly, even as the faces of angels." This is what we would expect to read if the Book of Mormon is about deification or theosis, or the transformation of an adamic body (natural man) into a glorious noomatic body that upon resurrection shall fully shine like the stars and capable of dwelling in the presence of Jehovah's everlasting burnings.


This made me think of the First Lecture on Faith where faith is defined as a principle of action which is based on the belief that God will redeem you and transform you into a luminous personage of holiness (set-apart luminous body of glory) like Christ per Lectures 5 & 7. 


Adrian Larson then quotes 3 Nephi, where Jesus speaks to the multitude and the "heavens open" and "they are encircled about with fire." This fire would again be the fiery glory of the Lord, the divine nooma, the omnipresent Mind of the Father and Son, the shared noomatic Glory (radiant Light and Intelligence) of the Father-Jehovah and Christ, as described in Lecture 5 and D&C 88.


Larson then says that the take-home points on how do you know you're on the Ascension Path? He says it starts with the doctrine of Christ in the Book of Mormon, which is simply repentance (changing course) unto baptism and then the baptism of fire (gift of the Holy Ghost implanting the divine seed and fluid nooma). He points out that none of this is a works-based ordinance, but a process of a humble receptiveness to the indwelling divine nooma


Larson then makes a good point by quoting Joseph Smith on the Book of Mormon being the "keystone of our religion, and a man would get nearer to God by abiding by its precepts, than by any other book." I never thought of that quote before as being about somebody would get nearer to God as meaning it is a book on how to get closer to God's actual divine presence; as a method of transformation in order to become like God and thus are able to be in His presence with a new divinized body.


As one person writes online named Josh h, on May 9, 2021:


... much of what we [as Brighamite Mormons] are told to believe has very little to do with the Book of Mormon but is instead sourced from the temple, D&C, Pearl of Great Price, and General Conference talks. That seems strange to me given that we consider the Book of Mormon to be the most correct book ever.


Even when I was a True Believing Mormon [in the Brighamite sect], I couldn’t understand why the Book of Mormon was so incomplete. Why would the Lord go to all the trouble of preserving for us a record that really has so little to do with [Brighamite] Church teachings and practices? ... (Source)


Now we know why this person was led to think the Book of Mormon was incomplete. This is because today's Brighamite Church Leaders don't want its original meanings to be taught, as it often contradicts the teachings of the Brighamite Brethren. The Book of Mormon is an ascension text which teaches one how to bypass churches and clergyman and have their own ascension experience and face to face encounter with God, either objectively in a vision or subjectively (internally) through a transformation of the heart and being born again. For example, in the Book of Mormon in Alma 32, a religious community is told they don't need to meet together once a week in a synagogue (a church-like indoor assembly of believers) after being kicked out of their own "church" community because of their poor attire, and instead they are told that they can access God anywhere and everywhere. Joseph Smith himself was unwelcomed by the Methodists at one point and so his experience in the woods and seeing a divine Light was I think for him like Paul's ascension to the third heaven; and so Joseph's Book of Mormon is in my view a midrash on the New Testament, designed to help a person, as Joseph puts it, "get nearer to God by abiding by its precepts ...” (History of the Church, 4:461); that is nearer to the fiery throne of God and His splendorous energy; as in, anyone can have direct access to God and receive the baptism of fire and partake of the divine gift (donation) of grace (i.e. deification) through the merits of Christ, by being reborn of God as children (the genus) of Christ (their spiritually genetic Father), without the need for any clergyman or membership in a sect. For, in the Book of Mormon, the authority to baptize and receive the fiery nooma, was simply gifted directly from God and was not handed down from a priesthood line of succession or any church tradition. God Himself simply gave them the power and authority to baptize and give the gift of the Holy Spirit (Sacred Nooma). In other words, just as the apostle Paul sidestepped the "authority" of the "super apostles" and the Jerusalem Church led by James, through his direct access to God and his fiery transformation to a noomatic body (theosis); and Paul's teaching Gentiles how to get nearer to God apart from the Temple Elites and those who sit in Moses' seat of authority prescribing the meaning of the Mosaic Law Code; so too,

 Joseph Smith sidestepped the requirement of a seminary education to minister and Catholic priesthood authority claims, through his own ascension experiences which led I think to his teaching how anyone can get near to God through the Book of Mormon as an ascension text.



Ascending beyond the Shame Cycle


Again, Larson explains that in Alma chapter 36, Alma the younger says that after praying for mercy that he could remember "his sins no more" and "what joy and what marvelous light I did behold."  What is most intriguing to me is that the Spencer W. Kimball and Boyd K. Packer mentality of turning everything into sexual guilt and shame is completely debunked with this more correct understanding of what the Scriptures are actually saying and meaning. Rather than Alma the younger experiencing religious shame and the need to go to a clergyman for absolution -- to do a kind of Catholic-like penance and receive quasi-absolution from another guy in a tie or robe based on the whims and personality of a priest or bishop -- what the Scriptures are actually talking about is an instant removal of all sin permanently; that is the very capacity to sin, for Paul explains the only an adamic body can "sin" (i.e. break the Mosaic "moral" code in Leviticus, or the Kosher prescriptions and circumcision, etc); but a person who supernaturally dies to their Adamic flesh in baptism and receives the genus of Christ through the fluid nooma, is no longer subject to the Mosaic moral law code but follows the ethical code of Christ. For the Christian undergoes a permanent infusion of the noomatic fullness of the Father's divine genes and partakes of His divine nature (DNA). This is why I think he could remember his sins no more, because he passed from death to life (from the "natural man" to a divinized man), being gifted the genes of a life of divine fullness/abundance): as his adamic body began the process of noomatic gene therapy into a luminous noomatic body. 


This is a radically different message than the shame and tame cycle of chasing a "worthy" label (in fear of being labeled unworthy) in the Brighamite sect and in Catholicism for example. This is the "born again" concept, but a better and more accurate understanding of being born anew through the fiery nooma: that burns away all Adamic limitations through the power of the divine Light; so that you become unspotted instantly and redeemed upon baptism through the fiery refining inpouring of the divine nooma. Now that is glad tidings!


Adrian Larson then suggests that repentance should be redefined as basically course-correcting away from the path of foolish errors and man-made traditions and false beliefs, and turning toward the path of scriptural truths and divine wisdom and basically a conscience illuminated by the Light of Christ. 


Larson points out that in Alma it is about not being led away after the tradition of their brethren.  He then discusses 2 Nephi and how Christ says to come unto him and you shall partake of the fruit of the tree of Life in Alma.


The Refiner's Fire


The main insight I had listening to Adrian Larson's presentation was that the pillar of fire and the people in Book of Mormon being encircled and enveloped by fire, and not burning, is about the refiner's fire. What I see is that basically the Book of Mormon is describing a burning away, or the beginning of the process of burning away the natural man (one's adamic nature) which means mankind's natural proclivity to be cowardly, arrogant and selfishness, with a propensity to blindly conform and follow the arm of flesh into false traditions; and instead, as one partakes of the divine nature (genus) through the baptism of fire and does what Jesus said and did (as found in the simple new covenant commandments in 3 Nephi), they are glorified and gifted a celestial body; beginning an ongoing process of deification through enduring hardship and ordeals with courage until at their death and resurrection they resurrect into a fully formed celestial body; which process Paul explains in 1 Corinthians 15 as the Adamic/natural-man body metamorphosizing into a celestial/noomatic body. As the Book of Mormon puts it (emphasis added):

Alma 5:62: 
I speak by way of command unto you that belong to the church; and unto those who do not belong to the church I speak by way of invitation, saying: Come and be baptized unto repentance, that you also may be partakers of the fruit [see 2 Peter 1:3-41 Nephi 8: 10-12, 24, 35 and 3 Nephi 19:30] of the tree of life [compare Alma 32: 37-41, where the "tree" therein is a metaphor of a growing celestial/noomatic body seeded by faith in the implanted divine Word
which is Christ as the fruit (or genus) of gifted eternal life per John 10:10].

4 Nephi 1:3:
And they had all things in common among them; therefore there were not rich and poor, bond and free, but they were all made free, and partakers of the heavenly gift.

The apostle Paul makes it clear that baptism represents a spiritual burial and the death of the adamic body and being reborn with a new Christic body making one a "new creature," as the deified noomatic body is fully metamorphosized into a body of glory at one's resurrection: which again Paul explains in 1 Corinthians 15 which is about how upon dying, if you had been baptized into Christ (His divine genus) then when your mortal body is buried, that upon resurrection your inner spirit is reclothed (puts on) a new noomatic (celestial) body and ascends to abide among the divine beings in celestial glory (star-like noomatic splendor), which aligns with D&C 76. 

The Book of Mormon explains this process of death to life in glory through noomatic fire. In both the New Testament and Book of Mormon, by being baptized into Christ, we are no longer a permanent mortal "noomatically" speaking, as we're gifted an immortal gene (genus), and thus were no longer under the Mosaic Law Code as the Law Code is for mortals. But you are redeemed (glorified) through the merits of Christ and are implanted with the divine nature (gift of the golden tree of life) and perfected (deified) in Christ and simply called to have the mind (mindset or attitude) of Christ

After All You Can Do?

Because the Book of Mormon is written mostly in the context of Jews still under the Law of Moses before Christ is even born, it says in 2 Nephi 25:23 that basically, before Jesus was born, Jewish Christians were saved "after all they can do," meaning they are saved already despite their efforts to perform the Mosaic Law; being already deified (and thus in the process of undergoing eventual full theosis) through their faith (allegiance and trust) in Christ prior to His birth. Then in 3 Nephi, Christ visits the Nephites and the Law of Moses becomes obsolete and Christ says to only do what He says and does which is His only doctrine. Jesus does not provide a Handbook of Instructions or a Manual or Creed, or a "higher priesthood" but instead the power to baptize, impart the Holy Spirit, and perform the Eucharist. Jesus only imparts a simple 4 Part "Doctrine of Christ." If this is the contents of the "most correct book on earth," as Joseph put it, and the way to draw closer/nearer to God, then this must be all we need to know and do to be in the presence of God.

 The Meaning of "White" in the Book of Mormon

This understanding of deification (salvific exaltation), as a burning away process and remolding like in metallurgy, so that one begins to shine and glow "spiritually" like a white-lighted star, helps us make sense of the language of "whiteness" in the Book of Mormon. For, on a careful reading we learn that the talk about being "white," fair, and delightsome in the Book of Mormon, actually means being white-lighted (star-like), fair (spiritually beautiful) and delightsome-to-God with a star-like shining countenance, similar to Moses's shining countenance; and thus we see in Jesus' transfiguration in the New Testament Him shining bright; and then the resurrected Christ shining on the Nephites so that they are as "white" (that is as bright) as Jesus' Sun-like glowing white-lighted radiance. For more details see my document here.

From the Ascension Path to the "Covenant Path"?

President Nelson has popularized the idea of being on the covenant path, which basically means following every step and works-based requirement set fourth by the Brighamite First Presidency: in order to earn a so-called "worthy" status and required temple recommend, in order get into the highest degree of heaven. However, a careful reading of the original Mormon Scriptures points to not a covenant path, but an ascension path through the refiner's fire (illuminating nooma) and the simple path of the Doctrine of Christ. 

This has led me to conclude that the Brighamite sect and its "covenant path" is in my view more of a self-help journey and tribal mentality to better maintain a cultural identity in a kind of fraternal social club which is ran by a corporation. As I see it, this means that while one may benefit from this fraternal structure and high demand religiousness, and I support anyone who chooses that path (which can be a great fraternal structure for raising a family), I don't think it's necessary for one's salvation or exaltation. In other words, I think Christians (including LDS Christians) that have exercised faith unto course-correcting and getting baptized, are already saved and exalted with a celestial body within them; and are thus "already worthy" of a celestial glory upon their baptism and fiery indwelling of the Sacred Nooma, and thus no additional "covenant path" is necessary.  However, that does not mean that such a "high demand path" does not have some psychological and cultural benefits for those in the Brighamite community, as such tribalism better solidifies a deeper sense of identity through the burden of such a "covenant path" and its clear borders, its drawing clear lines in the sand, in order to distinguish the worthy/insider from the unworthy/outsider; thus solidifying a tighter tribal identity and insider group mentality and thus ironically increasing well- being and security for some as insiders; while it also I think actually helps some of the tribal insiders become a better person in such a worthy-craving process, with all its checks and balances and accountability procedures.  Thus, for some people, the "covenant path" as a high demand religion can actually feel safer, more unifying, and even feel empowering. I just don't think that such a path is necessary for one's exaltation; and how much someone thrives in such a corporatized system or is harmed and diminished by it, has a lot to do with one's own subjective experiences, their unique personality type and temperament, their upbringing, and many other factors.

From Mormon House Churches and the Kirtland Temple in the early 1830s to the Nauvoo Era Temple Ritual of the 1840s

The original Mormons met in homes or outside in open gatherings to be a "church" (assemble of believers). Joseph Smith himself never sought to build churches/chapels, only temples; and the temple structure and ritual itself went through evolutionary changes. The first version of the Mormon temple structure and ritual was open to all and functioned more as a meeting house, befitting the original ascension theology.

As I argue in my blog series here, the later 1840s Nauvoo era temple itself was designed specifically with plural marriage in mind and was teaching -- through a masonic midrash ritual -- that Jehovah is a tangible body of flesh and thus God is not a god without parts and passions (as the Catholics and Protestants preach). So if polygamy is no longer practiced today by most Restoration sects, and most Mormons have already been taught and know God has a body, I do not see there being a need any longer for a higher priesthood; which was based in part on the idea of Joseph Smith acting out the role of temple priest with "keys" to lawfully seal polygamous marriages, and instill into the minds of the early saints the idea that God has a body through the 1840s temple ritual. Nor do I see the need today for a higher priesthood acting out the "keys of this priesthood" (as D&C 132 puts it) as "this priesthood" was the lawful right to enact the law of plural marriage (see D&C 132: 7, 19, 44-45, 58-59, 61-65); and the priesthood was also defined as the male seed (i.e. sperm) of the body in the LDS Book of Abraham 2:11. The higher priesthood was thus largely required for the performing of the ritual "sacrifices" (ordeals) of polygamous marriages (and seeding a new generation) on the metaphorical altar in the Mormon temple: in order to psychologically expiate the Augustinian Creeds from the consciousness of the saints, which I argue here had been successfully expiated and thus accomplished by 1890. I therefore argue that there's no longer any need for the Nauvoo era version of the temple ritual as it was a masonic-midrash aimed in part at expiating the belief in a god without parts and passions and overturning the puritanical Protestant attitude and monastic mentality, among most converts to early Mormonism. As Pratt puts it in his essay titled Intelligence and Affection, that the restored gospel corrects

All the monkish austerity, all the sadness and reserve, all the unsocial feelings and doings of priests, and monks, and nuns; all the long-facedness, unsocial sadness, groanings, sighs, and mortifications of sectaries, whether of ancient convents, where men and women retire from all the busy scenes and pleasures of life, to live a life of celibacy, self-denial and devotion; or whether in the more modern and fashionable circles of the camp meetings, or the “mourners bench.”


The fact is that the higher priesthood evolved dramatically from 1835 to 1844, as LDS scholar Gregory A. Prince demonstrates in his book Power from on High. Prince's historical analysis supports my view that the evolution of the higher priesthoods occurred in connection with Smith studying Hebrew in 1835; and his beginning to realize around 1836 that God the Father has a tangible body of flesh and the "Elohim" are gods with sensual bodies, which his First Vision experience in the 1820s did not reveal to him (see page 25 of A Reply to Dick Baer by LDS scholar John A. Tvedtnes [1985]); so that Joseph Smith felt called in the 1840s to restore this original pro-body Hebrew theology and so the 1840s Mormon temple ritual was clearly designed to cause a renewing of the minds of the saints: with polygamy being the dual means to both raise up a righteous seed (branch or qusai-ethnic indenity) and thus produce the Mormon People (through the priesthood/seed of men); in other words, it generated a new Christian culture (or mentally seeded consciousness); with those who would ideally no longer see God the Father as a bodiless nothingness (as in the sectarian Creeds) but a tangible "Man of holiness"; and so  Mormons with renewed minds would, as Parley P. Pratt explains in his essay Intelligence and Affection, basically no longer despise the body, wallowing in shame and guilt like Protestants or Catholics, but see our sensual bodily affections as good and holy. All of which was accomplished by 1890.

 So that with the ending of the practice of polygamy around 1890, it would logically follow that there would no longer be a need for a temple high priest nor temple sacrifices at the altar, which in context was all based on the expiating ritual of metaphorical sacrifices of plural marriages on the altar, and Joseph Smith acting as temple priest. So that in my view, especially since 1890, the pathway to the celestial kingdom has always been through the ascension path and/or the implanting of the divine seed (genus) through the baptism of fire alone; and thus the so-called "covenant path" is not required for celestial glory as one is already made worthy with a celestial body through gracious merits of Christ and His divine genus. So that it's not about obeying a pharisaical list of formulaic do's and don'ts based on the whims of Brighamite Leaders, but about appreciating the grace-gift of God's implanted genus that has generated within us a celestial body; which ideally one appreciates by loving others as much as Christ loved them while faithfully enduring (embracing ordeals) to the end. 

As I see it, Joseph Smith simply took a detour and in the 1840s by providing a temporary masonic ritual in order to raise up a "righteous seed" both mentally and physically, by producing a People with a new pro-body mindset. The handclasps and theater of the temple rite of 1844 was all about enacting a new mindset of "power in the priesthood (seed)" in order to generate a quasi-ethnic Peoplehood via the trial of plural marriages. The aim was for the temple attendee to realize that by passing through the symbolic veil in the temple that God the Father is a Man and not a vaporous bodiless nothingness (which I discuss in more detail in my document The Secret Doctrine of God). Thus, the temple ritual and plural marriages were only a temporary masonic-midrash ritual designed to generate a culture of Mormons with a new consciousness: that is a new or restored belief in the original pro-body Hebrew theology and a belief the original Hebrew God with a body. We know that all of this had been accomplished by 1890 because today in Utah and other areas, Mormons have become a unique Peoplehood with a clear understanding that God the Father has a body, etc. Hence we have evidence that Joseph Smith actually succeeded in raising up a righteous seed or branch (see Jacob 2: 25-30) in the form of the Mormon People with a new attitude about God and the body that is more in line with the original Hebrew theology. In Jacob 2: 25-30 it makes it clear that God commanding of His people to practice polygamy was in order to produce such a seed (a culture or branch), and thus it would only be temporary, and be ended once the raising up of such a seed (culture) had been accomplished. Jacob 2 also explains that monogamy is the norm. Meanwhile, the authority to baptize and perform ordinances in the Book of Mormon comes directly from God and the Holy Spirit, so as I see it the ending of plural marriage around 1890 inaugurated not just the end of plural marriages but the end of the post-1835 higher priesthood; and the temple priest who according to D&C 132 was basically assigned to orchestrate and approve such plural marriages on the altar.

So that today, I believe Mormon-Christians can or should revert back to the original understanding of priesthood in the Book of Mormon as a universal state of a life of holiness modeled after the nonhierarchical order of the Son of God (as Kristeen L. Black explains). Since much of the Nauvoo temple's ritual design was largely based on polygamous theology, I believe it is time to revert back to the more monogamous themes of the Kirkland era temple ritual; and/or worshipping God anywhere and everywhere as prescribed in Alma 32 (as an alternative option to "churching" in a building); and returning to the ascension theology and/or exaltation through the baptism of fire alone and the simple Doctrine of Christ; while restoring the original doctrine of the Lectures on Faith by putting them back into the scriptural cannon and thus respecting Joseph Smith's decision to re-publish the Lectures as scripture in the 1844 edition of the D&C (just before he died).

The "Covenant Path" versus the original Ascension Path

I would argue that while I respect the cultural accomplishments of the corporate Brigamite Church, as I still believe it does more good than harm overall and is a net positive for society; nevertheless, its current emphasis on the covenant path means that it's a rather controlling "high demand religion" (which LDS scholars admit), and yet Jesus said his Way is easy and unburdensome. This high demandingness has it's positives of course and I acknowledge those, however there are also negatives: like, unfortunately, such a worthy-label chasing system can lead to perfectionism, scrupliosity and chronic feelings of inadequacy (LDS apologists acknowledge this but tend to just blame those who don't fit their mold easily); as well as often leading to a holier than thou mentality among some (not all) Brighamites, through their feeling morally superior by merely acting out pious actions of religious conformity: such as feeling spiritually superior by wearing the sacred underwear as required or not drinking coffee for example, which can lead to a thumbing of one's nose at those who do drink coffee or tea or choose to wear non-religious underwear, etc. 

I have also found that the Brighamite "covenant path" can often cause the person to focus less on the ideal of Zion, if they are more primarily focused on themselves (their own piety and "worthy" status), and their immediate family's exaltation (through access to insiders-only temple rituals); that often exclude other family members who are labeled "unworthy" in the culture and blocked from entering the temple for not wanting to have their underwear habits monitored or are sometimes deemed "unworthy" for simply not believing in certain doctrines as literally as others; as John Dehlin experienced being interrogated by President Bryan King, who is clear in the interviews that if John would not conform to King's fundamentalistic/literalist beliefs, then he was going to be kicked out of the "club" and scarlet lettered. Note that post 2020 (and as of 2024), I am not a fan or supporter of John Dehlin and his one-sided, often anti-Christian, atheistic ideological political agenda; yet I know unfairness and unrighteous dominion when I heard it coming from President King.

A Return to Zion-Mindedness

In another video presentation by Adrian Larsen, at the 12-15 minute mark he discusses the illustration below. He illustrates a timeline showing the decline in focusing on actually forming Zion (in the Brighamite sect):

Click to Enlarge

Larson then explains how this happened in the illustration below, as he mentions how Brighamite leaders slowly garnered more power overtime and basically re-wrote Joseph Smith's religion with their own man-made traditions. Even gutting the original Scriptures by removing the doctrine portion of the Doctrine and Covenants (The Lectures on Faith) and for example re-interpreting the Word of Wisdom to now meaning by command and constraint while the scripture itself actually says the opposite: as in, their attitude became, "You will obey us and be behavior-controlled if you want to go to the temple and gain your exaltation and be sealed to your family." In other words, accept our reinterpretation of D&C 89 and other scriptures, or else no priesthood for you or no temple recommend for you, i.e. no seeing your daughter get married in the temple or being able to baptize your son, etc. So he explains in his illustration below, which is to be read from left to right, how Brighamite Leaders overtime moved away from the original meanings of the Mormon Scriptures, and developed their own man-made traditions:

Click to Enlarge

At the 31 minute mark, he makes some important comments on the true meaning of a prophet, seer and revelator, and the real meaning of priesthood; and the importance of Scripture over blind obedience to the arm of flesh. At 35 minutes, he points out that a common theme in all Scripture is the error (sin) of man-made false traditions that are odds at odds with the inspired canonized Scripture. 

Is an Actual Ascension to the 3rd Heaven Required?


In Part (2) I will argue that while a dramatic vision of ascending to the throne room of Jehovah is one way to experience illumination based on Scripture. I argue in Part 2 that Mormon Scripture (which includes the Bible), as well as Eastern Orthodox Christianity, also describes a simpler method of deification through a more internal subjective experience akin to "the still small voice." For not everyone is going to have an ascension vision akin to Paul and others; and instead most people are probably more likely to experience what Joseph Smith describes as pure intelligence flowing into them or what Pratt described as:

[The Holy Spirit] quickens all the intellectual faculties, increases, enlarges, expands, and purifies all the natural passions and affections, and adapts them, by the gift of wisdom, to their lawful use. It inspires, develops, cultivates, and matures all the fine-toned sympathies, joys, tastes, kindred feelings, and affections of our nature. It inspires virtue, kindness, goodness, tenderness, gentleness, and charity. It develops beauty of person, form, and features. It tends to health, vigor, animation, and social feeling. It invigorates all the faculties of the physical and intellectual man. It strengthens and gives tone to the nerves. In short, it is, as it were, marrow to the bone, joy to the heart, light to the eyes, music to the ears, and life to the whole being.

Or one may experience a simple warm feeling in the heart. All of these are various modes of experiencing the deifying baptism of fire according to Scripture.

Furthermore, Dan Vogel documents on page 119 of his book Charisma Under Pressure, that in 1831, Joseph Smith's "discussion of the powers of the high priesthood ... included the power of physical translation and of entering into God's presence as discussed in Alma 13. ... One purpose of the ... bestowal of additional authority [and 'power from on high'] was to energize the missionary force Smith was about to send out." The Footnote here reads:

As Alma explains, "There were many which were ordained and became High Priests of God ... and were sanctified, and their garments were washed white, through the blood of the Lamb. ... And there were many, exceeding great many, which were made pure, and entered into the rest of the Lord their God" [Alma 13: 10-12].
Note that these references are before the development of the priesthood (which later evolved beyond the mere offices of the Book of Mormon) and were designed only to orchestrate the power of the Holy Spirit in causing deification (theosis) and provide confidence for proselyting. Only later did the priesthood evolve into a hierarchical system, for details see Power from on High: The Development of Mormon Priesthood by Gregory A. Prince. As Vogel goes on to explain on page 123, "Before June 1831, the only major division of authority was between elders--the charismatic leaders--and all others: that is, priests, teachers, and deacons (see D&C 20: 38-45). However, it is important to note that while these men held different offices and callings, they had no concept there there were two priesthoods in the church until the introduction of the high priesthood ... At this point, nothing had been said about Smith and Cowdery having been ordained by angels; and nothing about Aaronic and Melchizedek priesthoods. This would come later ..." Vogel goes on to document that in 1831 it was understood that Smith and Cowdery were simply given the power and authority from the voice of God directly who commanded them to ordain each other to the office of Elder (in line with the Book of Mormon model). Thus we see that early on God's power or fluid energy was presented up to 1831 as that which could cause an instant translation (or deification), i.e. a causing of one to immediately become purified spiritually with their garments (souls) washed "white" (that is illuminated or deified) and thus instantly secured a place in the throne room of God to find rest. In other words, they don't see the Lord face to face in this context, but experience the fiery nooma that mystically ascends their souls to God to find rest through a subjective experience.

Go to Part (2)